NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 covers 27.1% of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System

16 of the 59 controls in APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System are already satisfied by evidence you collected for NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1. 43 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

27.1%
of the target already covered
16
controls evidenced
43
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System your NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

57 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

Governance1 of 1 evidenced
CBPR Program Requirements: Accountability8 of 12 evidenced, 4 to do
CBPR Program Requirements: Notice2 of 4 evidenced, 2 to do
CBPR Program Requirements: Uses of Personal Information2 of 6 evidenced, 4 to do
CBPR Program Requirements: Security Safeguards2 of 10 evidenced, 8 to do
CBPR Program Requirements: Integrity of Personal Information1 of 5 evidenced, 4 to do
Risk0 of 1 evidenced, 1 to do
Transparency0 of 1 evidenced, 1 to do
Data Minimization0 of 1 evidenced, 1 to do
Purpose Limitation0 of 1 evidenced, 1 to do
Consent0 of 1 evidenced, 1 to do
Data Quality0 of 1 evidenced, 1 to do
Security0 of 1 evidenced, 1 to do
Individual Rights0 of 1 evidenced, 1 to do
CBPR Program Requirements: Access and Correction0 of 3 evidenced, 3 to do
CBPR Program Requirements: Choice0 of 7 evidenced, 7 to do
CBPR Program Requirements: Collection Limitation0 of 3 evidenced, 3 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

SA-9Principle IX, Accountabilityargued against and upheld
Accountability

External service provider governance is the accountability mechanism for onward transfers to processors.

PM-17Principle IX, Accountabilityargued against and upheld
Accountability

Enforces the terms under which external parties may hold organizational information.

AC-20Principle IX, Accountabilityargued against and upheld
Accountability

Sets and verifies the terms under which providers may process organizational information.

PM-18Program Requirements, Accountability, question 39argued against and upheld
Measures to ensure compliance

The privacy programme plan is the documented measure that gives effect to privacy obligations.

PM-19Program Requirements, Accountability, question 40argued against and upheld
Responsible individual appointed

Names the leader accountable for privacy across the organization and its providers.

PM-26Program Requirements, Accountability, question 41argued against and upheld
Complaint handling procedures

Complaint management establishes receipt, investigation and routing of privacy complaints.

PM-26Program Requirements, Accountability, question 42argued against and upheld
Timely complaint response

Complaint management routes complaints to the responsible party so responses are timely.

SA-9Program Requirements, Accountability, question 46argued against and upheld
Mechanisms with processors to meet obligations

Governs external service providers across their life cycle and allocates responsibilities.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk