NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)ISO/IEC 42001:2023

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) covers 78.9% of ISO/IEC 42001:2023

30 of the 38 controls in ISO/IEC 42001:2023 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). 8 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

78.9%
of the target already covered
30
controls evidenced
8
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

What this leaves you to do

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 has 38 controls. Holding NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) already evidences 30 of them, so the work in front of you is 8 controls, not 38, which is 21% of the standard rather than all of it.

That is the whole claim. Every number in that sentence comes from the two counts above it and can be re-derived from the free tools without taking our word for any of it.

In money, using only our numbers. The full report is $299 and names 30 controls of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 you do not have to implement again, which is $9.97 per control identified. That arithmetic uses our price and our count and assumes nothing about you.

In your hours, using your assumption. We do not know what a control costs you to implement, so pick the column that looks like your organisation. These are your figures, not our claim.

If a control takes you4 hours8 hours16 hours
the 30 already evidenced are120 hours240 hours480 hours
and the 8 remaining are32 hours64 hours128 hours

Multiply by your own rate. We publish no rate because we have not measured yours, and a number built on an invented rate is the kind of claim this platform exists to argue against.

This number is directional. It says how much of ISO/IEC 42001:2023 your NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

39 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-20.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk