ISO 27001:2022PCI DSS 4.0

ISO 27001:2022 covers 55.8% of PCI DSS 4.0

139 of the 249 controls in PCI DSS 4.0 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ISO 27001:2022. 110 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

55.8%
of the target already covered
139
controls evidenced
110
genuine gaps
406
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your ISO 27001:2022 evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

579 candidate mappings were examined and 415 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

Req 6: Secure Systems and Software17 of 19 evidenced, 2 to do
Req 1: Network Security Controls16 of 19 evidenced, 3 to do
Req 9: Restrict Physical Access19 of 26 evidenced, 7 to do
Req 2: Secure Configurations8 of 11 evidenced, 3 to do
Req 7: Restrict Access by Need to Know7 of 12 evidenced, 5 to do
Req 5: Anti-Malware7 of 13 evidenced, 6 to do
Req 10: Logging and Monitoring14 of 27 evidenced, 13 to do
Req 12: Information Security Policies19 of 37 evidenced, 18 to do
Req 4: Protect Cardholder Data in Transit3 of 6 evidenced, 3 to do
Req 3: Protect Stored Account Data13 of 29 evidenced, 16 to do
Req 8: Identify and Authenticate Users10 of 29 evidenced, 19 to do
Req 11: Test Security Regularly6 of 21 evidenced, 15 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

5.11.1.1argued against and upheld
NSC policies and procedures documented

Policies for information security include the network security control policy.

5.21.1.2argued against and upheld
Roles and responsibilities for Requirement 1

Information security roles and responsibilities assigns ownership for network controls.

8.91.2.1argued against and upheld
NSC configuration standards defined

Configuration management defines network security control standards.

8.321.2.2argued against and upheld
Changes to NSC reviewed and approved

Change management reviews and approves changes to network controls.

8.91.2.5argued against and upheld
Services, protocols, ports inventoried and justified

Configuration management enumerates and justifies enabled services and ports.

8.211.2.6argued against and upheld
Security features for insecure services defined

Security of network services defines protections for insecure services.

8.201.2.7argued against and upheld
NSC rule sets reviewed every six months

Networks security requires rule sets be reviewed and kept current.

8.91.2.8argued against and upheld
Configuration files secured and synchronised

Configuration management protects and synchronises device configuration files.

Claims that did not hold

406 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.

5.371.1.1
NSC policies and procedures documented

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

8.201.2.1
NSC configuration standards defined

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

8.221.2.3
Network diagrams maintained

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

8.271.2.3
Network diagrams maintained

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

8.201.2.5
Services, protocols, ports inventoried and justified

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

8.81.2.6
Security features for insecure services defined

retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.

Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.

8.201.3.1
Inbound traffic to CDE restricted

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

8.201.3.2
Outbound traffic from CDE restricted

Held back 2026-08-19. Generated by the retired metered path, refuted at 56 percent wherever re-judged. Pair pulled from sale pending a rebuild on the Max plan.

Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk