HIPAA Security Rule covers 37.3% of CMMC 2.0
41 of the 110 controls in CMMC 2.0 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for HIPAA Security Rule. 69 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of CMMC 2.0 your HIPAA Security Rule evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
96 candidate mappings were examined and 26 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Technical controls allowing only authorized persons or programs access is the same limitation.
Automatic logoff after a predetermined inactivity period is a session lock.
Terminating an electronic session after inactivity is session termination.
Transmission security requires encrypted transport and validated VPN for remote sessions.
The encryption mechanism covers ePHI held on mobile devices.
Access authorization is written per workstation, transaction, program and process.
Information access management mandates minimum necessary and least privilege.
Periodic reminders keep risk awareness current across the workforce.
Claims that did not hold
25 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.
retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.
Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.
retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.
Claimed at low confidence before it was rejected.
retired metered-API path. 56 percent of its output was refuted wherever it was re-judged, so its residue is not trusted evidence. Superseded by judgement on the Claude Max plan 2026-08-19.
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
Refuted in review.
Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.
Refuted in review.
Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.
Refuted in review.
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
Refuted in review.
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
Refuted in review.
Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk