GDPR covers 34.3% of ISO 27701:2019
37 of the 108 controls in ISO 27701:2019 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for GDPR. 71 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of ISO 27701:2019 your GDPR evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
75 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-20, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Requires notifying affected individuals, which is the other party this control names.
Requires documenting every breach, its effects and remedial action, with notification timings.
Requires implementing appropriate data protection policies committing the organisation to the law.
Requires a published contact point reachable by individuals and by the supervisory authority.
Requires ability to restore availability and access to personal data after an incident.
Purposes must be specified, explicit and legitimate, and the controller must demonstrate it.
Purposes must be documented well enough to state to the individual at collection.
Requires an additional condition for special categories, which is the classification element.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk