FedRAMP Moderate covers 28.1% of ISO 22301:2019
16 of the 57 controls in ISO 22301:2019 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for FedRAMP Moderate. 41 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of ISO 22301:2019 your FedRAMP Moderate evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
68 candidate mappings were examined and 10 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
A plan of action and milestones tracking remediation of assessment findings is corrective action under 10.1.
Contingency planning policy is issued, approved at senior level and reviewed on a defined cycle.
Contingency training trains personnel in their assigned continuity roles and responsibilities.
Contingency training makes personnel aware of the plan and their part in it.
Criticality analysis identifies critical components and functions, the core of impact analysis.
Identifying essential missions, functions and recovery priorities is a business impact analysis.
Risk assessment of likelihood and impact to operations and assets is the same activity.
An alternate processing site with the equipment and supplies needed to resume operations is a determined resource requirement.
Claims that did not hold
9 proposed mappings for this pair were rejected. They are kept in the graph rather than deleted, so what was thrown out is as inspectable as what survived. A crosswalk that never rejects anything is not being judged.
target corrected: ISO 22301 clauses 10.1 and 10.2 were swapped in the graph
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
parent and subclause double counted, resolved to the most specific clause
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
parent and subclause double counted, resolved to the most specific clause
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
attached to a mis-titled clause, real 6.1.2 is Addressing risks and opportunities
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
a contingency plan is not objective setting, and CP-2 maps correctly to 8.4.4 Business continuity plans
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
8.3.5 is implementing the selected solutions; this control provides resources, so it belongs on 8.3.4
Claimed at medium confidence before it was rejected.
8.3.5 is implementing the selected solutions; this control provides resources, so it belongs on 8.3.4
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
parent and subclause double counted, resolved to the most specific clause
Claimed at high confidence before it was rejected.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk