CCPA/CPRA covers 46.7% of APPI
14 of the 30 controls in APPI are already satisfied by evidence you collected for CCPA/CPRA. 16 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of APPI your CCPA/CPRA evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
36 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-20, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
The notice must identify the purposes for which each category of data will be used.
Purposes must be disclosed and no incompatible additional purpose used without fresh notice.
Sensitive data use confined to the reasonably expected service or a listed permitted purpose.
Data may not be handled for purposes incompatible with those disclosed at collection.
Sets the required content and delivery of the purpose notice at collection.
Purposes of use must be told to the consumer at or before the point of collection.
The published privacy policy must state the business and commercial purposes.
Inaccurate data must be corrected using commercially reasonable efforts on request.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk