Azure Security BenchmarkPCI DSS 4.0

Azure Security Benchmark covers 33.3% of PCI DSS 4.0

83 of the 249 controls in PCI DSS 4.0 are already satisfied by evidence you collected for Azure Security Benchmark. 166 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

33.3%
of the target already covered
83
controls evidenced
166
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your Azure Security Benchmark evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

177 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

Req 7: Restrict Access by Need to Know7 of 12 evidenced, 5 to do
Req 6: Secure Systems and Software10 of 19 evidenced, 9 to do
Req 10: Logging and Monitoring14 of 27 evidenced, 13 to do
Req 1: Network Security Controls9 of 19 evidenced, 10 to do
Req 2: Secure Configurations5 of 11 evidenced, 6 to do
Req 5: Anti-Malware5 of 13 evidenced, 8 to do
Req 8: Identify and Authenticate Users10 of 29 evidenced, 19 to do
Req 11: Test Security Regularly7 of 21 evidenced, 14 to do
Req 4: Protect Cardholder Data in Transit2 of 6 evidenced, 4 to do
Req 3: Protect Stored Account Data9 of 29 evidenced, 20 to do
Req 12: Information Security Policies5 of 37 evidenced, 32 to do
Req 9: Restrict Physical Access0 of 26 evidenced, 26 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

ASB v3 GS-41.1.1argued against and upheld
NSC policies and procedures documented

Documented network security guidance, policy and standards is the network control policy required.

ASB v3 PV-11.2.1argued against and upheld
NSC configuration standards defined

Defined secure configuration baselines per resource type include network control standards.

ASB v3 NS-81.2.5argued against and upheld
Services, protocols, ports inventoried and justified

Detecting services and protocols at operating system, application and package layers inventories them.

ASB v3 NS-81.2.6argued against and upheld
Security features for insecure services defined

Applying compensating controls where insecure protocols cannot be disabled is this requirement.

ASB v3 NS-31.3.1argued against and upheld
Inbound traffic to CDE restricted

Edge firewall with documented rules controls inbound traffic to the environment.

ASB v3 NS-11.3.1argued against and upheld
Inbound traffic to CDE restricted

Security group rules on subnets restrict inbound traffic to the sensitive environment.

ASB v3 NS-31.3.2argued against and upheld
Outbound traffic from CDE restricted

Edge firewall control of outbound traffic restricts egress from the environment.

ASB v3 NS-31.4.1argued against and upheld
NSCs between trusted and untrusted networks

A firewall at the enterprise edge is the control between trusted and untrusted networks.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk