Azure Security Benchmark covers 61.9% of ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0)
26 of the 42 controls in ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) are already satisfied by evidence you collected for Azure Security Benchmark. 16 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) your Azure Security Benchmark evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
77 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
The identity strategy defines authentication strength standards and requires them applied.
Keeping credentials out of code and configuration in a secure key store protects stored passwords.
Requiring strong authentication for privileged access covers the privileged clause.
Enforced phishing resistant multi factor authentication is strong authentication deployed broadly.
Compute baselines established at deployment deliver operating system hardening.
Defining secure configuration baselines for every resource type is the minimum security level.
Detecting and disabling insecure services removes unnecessary services across the estate.
Policy driven audit and enforcement across subscriptions is centralised uniform policy application.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk