ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsHIPAA Security Rule

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents covers 22.4% of HIPAA Security Rule

15 of the 67 controls in HIPAA Security Rule are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. 52 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

22.4%
of the target already covered
15
controls evidenced
52
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of HIPAA Security Rule your ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

34 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

Administrative12 of 32 evidenced, 20 to do
Technical3 of 12 evidenced, 9 to do
Physical0 of 12 evidenced, 12 to do
Organizational0 of 6 evidenced, 6 to do
Policies and Procedures0 of 5 evidenced, 5 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

ASD37-31164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D)argued against and upheld
Information System Activity Review (Required)

ASD hunting is regular review and analysis of logs and events for adversary activity.

ASD37-28164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D)argued against and upheld
Information System Activity Review (Required)

A 24/7 capability reviews security events automatically and manually on a continuous basis.

ASD37-37164.308(a)(3)(ii)(B)argued against and upheld
Workforce Clearance Procedure (Addressable)

ASD personnel management requires pre-employment background checks before access is granted.

ASD37-18164.308(a)(4)(ii)(B)argued against and upheld
Access Authorization (Addressable)

ASD authorises administrative access to systems and applications strictly by user duties.

ASD37-18164.308(a)(4)(ii)(C)argued against and upheld
Access Establishment and Modification (Addressable)

ASD requires the need for privileges to be revalidated regularly, which is access recertification.

ASD37-15164.308(a)(5)(i)argued against and upheld
Security Awareness and Training (Standard)

ASD user education covers threats, reporting and consequences for the whole workforce.

ASD37-37164.308(a)(5)(i)argued against and upheld
Security Awareness and Training (Standard)

ASD personnel management requires ongoing security awareness training be sustained.

ASD37-01164.308(a)(5)(ii)(B)argued against and upheld
Protection from Malicious Software (Addressable)

Application control prevents unapproved or malicious programs, scripts and installers executing.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk