APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System covers 69.2% of Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)
9 of the 13 controls in Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) are already satisfied by evidence you collected for APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System. 4 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.
This number is directional. It says how much of Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) your APEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.
39 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.
Where the gaps are
Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.
Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.
Claims that held
A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.
Requires maintained internal policies and implementing arrangements that ensure compliance with the privacy principles.
Requires published clear and easily accessible statements of the practices governing personal information held.
Requires steps verifying information is up to date, accurate and complete for the purposes of use.
Requires personal information to be maintained accurate, complete and up to date for purposes of use.
Requires the enumerated specific safeguards to be implemented proportionally to risk.
Requires safeguards demonstrably proportional to harm, sensitivity and context, the reasonable steps test.
Requires physical, technical and administrative safeguards against loss, unauthorised access, use and disclosure.
Requires access to be given within a reasonable timeframe in an understandable form.
Claims that did not hold
Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.
The full report
Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.
Buy this crosswalk