TheArtOfService
ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0)Azure Security Benchmark

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) covers 37.6% of Azure Security Benchmark

32 of the 85 controls in Azure Security Benchmark are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0). 53 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

37.6%
of the target already covered
32
controls evidenced
53
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of Azure Security Benchmark your ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

64 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

Governance and Strategy7 of 10 evidenced, 3 to do
Privileged Access5 of 8 evidenced, 3 to do
Posture and Vulnerability Management4 of 7 evidenced, 3 to do
Backup and Recovery2 of 4 evidenced, 2 to do
Network Security4 of 10 evidenced, 6 to do
Data Protection3 of 8 evidenced, 5 to do
Incident Response2 of 7 evidenced, 5 to do
Logging and Threat Detection2 of 7 evidenced, 5 to do
Identity Management2 of 9 evidenced, 7 to do
Asset Management1 of 5 evidenced, 4 to do
DevOps Security0 of 7 evidenced, 7 to do
Endpoint Security0 of 3 evidenced, 3 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

mesure 29ASB v3 AM-4argued against and upheld
Limit access to asset management

Administration rights are limited to operational need.

mesure 9ASB v3 AM-4argued against and upheld
Limit access to asset management

Rights on sensitive resources are granted by need and reviewed.

mesure 37ASB v3 BR-1argued against and upheld
Ensure regular automated backups

A backup policy covering critical components is defined and applied.

mesure 37ASB v3 BR-4argued against and upheld
Regularly test backup

Restoration from backup is verified to work.

mesure 4ASB v3 DP-1argued against and upheld
Discover, classify, and label sensitive data

The most sensitive information and the servers holding it are identified.

mesure 21ASB v3 DP-3argued against and upheld
Encrypt sensitive data in transit

Secure protocol versions replace unprotected equivalents.

mesure 18ASB v3 DP-3argued against and upheld
Encrypt sensitive data in transit

Sensitive data transmitted over the internet is encrypted.

mesure 31ASB v3 DP-4argued against and upheld
Enable data at rest encryption by default

Sensitive data at rest is encrypted, in particular where equipment may be lost.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk