ACSC Essential EightASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents

ACSC Essential Eight covers 32.4% of ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents

12 of the 37 controls in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents are already satisfied by evidence you collected for ACSC Essential Eight. 25 are genuine gaps. Every claim below was judged against both control sets and then argued against; the ones that did not survive are published further down with the reason each failed.

32.4%
of the target already covered
12
controls evidenced
25
genuine gaps
0
claims rejected in review

This number is directional. It says how much of ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents your ACSC Essential Eight evidence satisfies. The reverse pair is a different number, often very different, because a security standard has enormous depth for access control and almost none for lawful basis or data subject rights.

29 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed. Signed off 2026-08-19, review level machine verified. Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

Where the gaps are

Coverage is never evenly spread. A source standard usually satisfies one part of a target almost completely and barely touches another, and which part is which is the thing worth knowing before you plan the work.

Recovering Data and System Availability3 of 3 evidenced
Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents5 of 10 evidenced, 5 to do
Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution4 of 17 evidenced, 13 to do
Detecting Cyber Security Incidents and Responding0 of 6 evidenced, 6 to do
Preventing Malicious Insiders0 of 1 evidenced, 1 to do

Theme level, not control level, deliberately. The per-control list of what is evidenced and what is a gap is the report itself, so publishing it here would be publishing the thing being sold.

Claims that held

A sample. Each one names the control whose evidence does the work, the control it satisfies, and why.

E8-APP-ML2ASD37-01argued against and upheld
Application control (Essential)

Control extends to internet facing servers and all locations, with a vendor blocklist.

E8-APP-ML1ASD37-01argued against and upheld
Application control (Essential)

Application control restricts executables, libraries, scripts and installers to an approved set.

E8-PATCHAPP-ML3ASD37-02argued against and upheld
Patch applications (Essential)

The forty eight hour window covers priority applications where working exploits exist.

E8-PATCHAPP-ML2ASD37-02argued against and upheld
Patch applications (Essential)

Applications outside the priority classes are scanned fortnightly and patched within one month.

E8-PATCHAPP-ML1ASD37-02argued against and upheld
Patch applications (Essential)

Critical application patches are applied within forty eight hours and unsupported versions removed.

E8-MACRO-ML2ASD37-03argued against and upheld
Configure Microsoft Office macro settings (Essential)

Macros are additionally blocked from making Win32 API calls.

E8-MACRO-ML1ASD37-03argued against and upheld
Configure Microsoft Office macro settings (Essential)

Macros from the internet are blocked, macros disabled without business need, settings locked.

E8-UAH-ML2ASD37-04argued against and upheld
User application hardening (Essential)

Browsers, office suites and PDF readers are hardened to published guidance.

Claims that did not hold

Nothing proposed for this pair was rejected in review. That is unusual and worth knowing rather than hiding: it means the candidate set was small and every candidate held.

The full report

Everything above is a sample. The report is every evidenced control and every gap, with the reasoning and the source document behind each one, in a form you can hand to an assessor. $299, emailed immediately.

Buy this crosswalk