Sweden MCFFS 2026:12 Security Audit and Security Scanning Regulations
3 kap. Säkerhetsskanning: security scanning of the operator's digital environment (3 kap. 1 to 9 §§) – Sweden MCFFS 2026:12 Security Audit and Security Scanning Regulations

Sweden MCFFS 2026:12 Security Audit and Security Scanning Regulations 3:6: In choosing a scanning method the supervisory authority must consider the systems' importance to the operator's activities, and where a significant risk of adverse consequences is identified must consider alternative methods and whether to scan at all

What does 3:6 require?

The method for a security scan is chosen with regard to how important the targeted systems are to the operator's business. If a significant risk of negative consequences for the operator is identified, the authority must weigh alternative scanning methods and reconsider whether the scan should go ahead.

Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 19011:2018 · 1 control

  • 5.5.3 Selecting and determining audit methods

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in 3 kap. Säkerhetsskanning: security scanning of the operator's digital environment (3 kap. 1 to 9 §§) – Sweden MCFFS 2026:12 Security Audit and Security Scanning Regulations

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.