The roles and duties for carrying out the activities in Requirement 3 must be written down, allocated to named people or functions, and understood by the individuals who hold them. Guidance notes they may sit inside the policies and procedures or in separate documents, offers a responsibility matrix (RACI) as one way to record them, and suggests entities consider having staff acknowledge their assigned duties. Customized approach objective: day-to-day work for protecting stored account data is allocated, and the people involved are accountable for its ongoing, successful operation.
This control maps to 22 controls across 16 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
PCI DSS 4.0 3.1.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of PCI DSS 4.0 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27001:2022 and 139 of 280 PCI DSS 4.0 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 415 were rejected on the ISO 27001:2022 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 22 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.