NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 164.308(a)(4)(ii)(B): Access Authorization (Addressable)

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 59 controls across 23 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

PCI DSS 4.0 · 7 controls

7.2.2 7.2.2 User access assigned by job function and least privilege
7.2.3 7.2.3 Privileges approved by authorized personnel
8.2.4 8.2.4 User ID lifecycle changes authorized
9.3.2 9.3.2 Visitor access procedures for the CDE
7.2.4 7.2.4 User accounts and privileges reviewed every six months
7.2.5 7.2.5 Application and system accounts least privilege
7.3.1 7.3.1 Need-to-know access control system covers all components

ISO 27001:2022 · 5 controls

5.1 Policies for information security
5.15 Access control
5.16 Identity management
5.18 Access rights
8.3 Information access restriction

Azure Security Benchmark · 4 controls

ASBv3-PA-7 Follow just enough administration (least privilege) principle
IM-7 Restrict resource access based on conditions
PA-2 Avoid standing access for user accounts and permissions
PA-3 Manage lifecycle of identities and entitlements

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

CIS-2.3 Address Unauthorized Software
CIS-6.1 Establish an Access Granting Process
CIS-6.7 Centralize Access Control
CIS-6.8 Define and Maintain Role-Based Access Control

CMMC 2.0 · 4 controls

AC.L2-3.1.2 Transaction & Function Control
AC.L2-3.1.4 Separation of Duties
AC.L2-3.1.5 Least Privilege
IA.L2-3.5.2 Authentication

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

NIST800-AC-1 AC-1 Policy and Procedures
NIST800-AC-2 AC-2 Account Management
NIST800-AC-24 AC-24 Access Control Decisions
NIST800-AC-6 AC-6 Least Privilege

SOC 2 · 4 controls

SOC2-CC5.3 CC5.3 Deploying controls through policies and procedures (COSO principle 12)
SOC2-CC6.2 CC6.2 Registering and authorising users before issuing credentials
SOC2-CC6.3 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties
SOC2-P5.1 P5.1 Data subject access

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 3 controls

SEC02-BP06 Employ user groups and attributes
SEC03-BP02 Grant least privilege access
SEC03-BP06 Manage access based on lifecycle

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) · 2 controls

ANSSI-HYG-09 Assign the Correct Rights on Sensitive Resources
ANSSI-HYG-29 Limit Administration Rights on Workstations to Operational Need

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 2 controls

CCM-IAM-06 User Access Provisioning
CCM-IAM-16 Authorization Mechanisms

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

AC-2 Account Management
AC-6 Least Privilege

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

AC-2 Account Management
AC-6 Least Privilege

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

5.18 Access rights
8.19 Installation of software on operational systems

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 2 controls

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01 Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed by the organization
NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 2 controls

161R1-AC-2 Account Management
161R1-AC-24 Access Control Decisions

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

03.01.01 Account Management
03.01.02 Access Enforcement

UK Cyber Essentials · 2 controls

CE-AC.1 User Account Approval Process
CE-AC.4 Privileged Account Approval and Tracking

ACSC Essential Eight · 1 control

E8-ADMIN-ML1 Restrict Administrative Privileges (ML1)

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents · 1 control

ASD37-18 Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 · 1 control

MYHR-SEC-7 Consumer access controls and consent

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

C5-IDM-02 Granting and change of user accounts and access rights

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

CFTC-SS-3 Information Security Category

ISO 27701:2019 · 1 control

6.6.2 User access management

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.