Under GDPR art. 10, criminal-offence data may be processed where the data subject gave explicit consent for specified purposes; processing is necessary to protect vital interests where he cannot consent; the data were manifestly made public by him; processing is necessary to establish, exercise or substantiate a legal claim or for courts acting in their judicial capacity; processing is necessary for a weighty public interest as in art. 23(a) and (b); or processing is necessary for research or statistics under GDPR art. 89(1) meeting the conditions of art. 24(b) to (d).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.