Liechtenstein DSG Articles 50-65 Enforcement and Sanctions. Articles 50-55 DSS Powers (transposing GDPR Articles 57-59): investigations + audits + on-site inspection + reprimands + warnings + temporary or definitive bans + processing suspension + Cross-Border data flow suspension + administrative fines (Verwaltungsbussen). Articles 56-58 Administrative Fines - GDPR Article 83 tiered system: (i) up to EUR 10 million or 2% of total worldwide annual turnover whichever is higher for lower-tier infringements (Article 83(4) GDPR - records + DPO + breach notification + security + processor obligations + certification); (ii) up to EUR 20 million or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover whichever is higher for higher-tier infringements (Article 83(5) GDPR - principles + lawful basis + consent + data subject rights + Cross-Border + DSS order non-compliance). DSS Resolution criteria mirroring GDPR Article 83(2): gravity + good faith + advantage obtained + adverse impact + cumulative + mitigation + cooperation. Articles 59-62 Criminal Sanctions - Liechtenstein Penal Code (Strafgesetzbuch - StGB) Article 188 (Verletzung des Berufsgeheimnisses - violation of professional secrecy) imprisonment up to 6 months or fine + Article 195 (Verletzung des Datenbankgeheimnisses - violation of database secrecy) up to 6 months + Liechtenstein DSG criminal provisions for wilful violations 1-3 years imprisonment + fines + corporate criminal liability. Article 63 DSS Cooperation with EDPB consistency mechanism + Convention 108+ Committee + EEA EDPS coordination + Swiss FDPIC coordination via bilateral arrangements + FMA financial sector cooperation. Articles 64-65 Judicial review by Liechtenstein Administrative Court + appeal to Constitutional Court + EFTA Court for EEA-related disputes via EFTA Surveillance Authority. Civil liability under Liechtenstein Civil Code (Allgemeines Burgerliches Gesetzbuch - ABGB) + Persons and Companies Act (PGR) + damages claims + class actions emerging.
This control maps to 14 controls across 12 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 14 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.