The rights of GDPR arts 15 to 22 may not be exercised by request to the controller or complaint to the Garante where exercising them could actually and concretely prejudice: anti-money laundering interests; support to victims of extortion; parliamentary inquiry commissions; public bodies' monetary, payment and financial supervision functions; defence investigations or legal claims; the confidentiality of the identity of a whistleblower reporting under D.Lgs. 24/2023 or the banking and financial market acts; or tax interests and anti-evasion activity. In these cases (except the commissions) the rights are exercised under the sector rules, and exercise may be delayed, limited or excluded by a reasoned communication given without delay (unless it would defeat the purpose), for as long as necessary and proportionate; the data subject may then exercise the rights through the Garante (art. 160), and the controller must inform the data subject of that option.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.