Without prejudice to D.Lgs. 51/2018, processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions, offences or related security measures on a GDPR art. 6(1) basis that is not carried out under the control of official authority is allowed, under GDPR art. 10, only if authorised by a provision of law or, where the law provides, of regulation, with appropriate safeguards. Paragraph 3 lists matters, including (a) obligations and rights in employment law within the limits of laws, regulations and collective agreements, verification of integrity requirements, insurance fraud, legal claims, defence investigations under the public security act, anti-mafia documentation, public tender integrity, legality rating and anti-money laundering. Processing under official control follows art. 2-sexies. Paragraphs 2, 4 and 6 (the ministerial decree route and interim Garante authorisation) were repealed by Law 2 December 2025 no. 182 (in force 18 December 2025).
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.