Art. 4 of Law 300/1970 on remote monitoring remains in force: equipment that can monitor workers remotely only for organisational and production needs, safety or asset protection and only after a union agreement or labour inspectorate authorisation, work tools and attendance recorders excepted, and use of the data only after adequate information to workers and in compliance with this Code. The Garante enforces art. 4 together with the GDPR principles (lawfulness, minimisation, storage limitation) in its decisions on video surveillance, email and internet use and geolocation.
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.