An independent assessor or other authorised party should be able to evaluate what DEFRs and DESs did, which depends on every action being properly documented. They should be able to justify how they chose a course of action, and their processes should be open to independent assessment of whether the approach taken was scientifically sound.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.