The committee analyses the impact and complexity of implementing the elements designed in the iteration and, for each one, assigns a development team, communicates management objectives and direction, provides adequate resources, has the element developed and implemented, determines the training its actors need and provides it. Where elements are outsourced or acquired, the supplier receives the committee's requirements and builds to them. Domain experts (legal, forensic, technology, cryptography, privacy) support the teams. Auditors verify that elements were implemented according to the design outcomes and that the identified training was delivered.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.