The organization sets up, and actually uses, a framework for taking asset management decisions that fits its type, size and complexity. Through that framework it (1) spells out and settles the value it expects the asset management system to draw from its assets and (2) sets the criteria that asset management decisions are judged against so that the settled value is achieved. In building and using the framework it takes into account (a) its context, its organizational objectives and its internal and external issues, (b) what stakeholders require, (c) the scope of the system, which fixes the range of decisions to be taken on assets, on asset management and on the system itself, and (d) risks and opportunities.
This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
ISO 55001:2024 4.5.1 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 55001:2024 your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 55001:2014 and 27 of 38 ISO 55001:2024 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO 55001:2014 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.