The organization must decide what is to be monitored and measured, how interested parties will take part, which methods of monitoring, measuring, analysing and evaluating will give valid results, when monitoring and measurement happen, and when the results are analysed and evaluated; it must keep documented evidence of the results. Data are gathered on indicators, quantitative or qualitative, for each issue selected, grouped for example as environmental and weather data, socio-economic data, financial data and data on project outputs. The organization must: assess regularly how the management system is performing and how effective it is, to confirm that the policy, the strategic and operational objectives and the compliance obligations are being met, that the system still works to sustain and improve sustainability, and to amend its policies and objectives on sustainable development, smartness and resilience where needed; report to interested parties, and to the representatives they elect or appoint, in a valid and accessible way that invites feedback and constructive challenge; use performance indicators that are measurable, objective, verifiable, reproducible, appropriate, in line with community policies, practical, cost-effective, technologically feasible, few in number, accurate and representative of the purposes and issues, involving interested parties where appropriate; and keep watch on the significant aspects and impacts it has, whether economic, social or environmental, as its policy and objectives require.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.