The organization must provide a mechanism for individuals to modify or withdraw consent, inform them of their rights to withdraw at any time, use a withdrawal mechanism consistent with the one used to obtain consent, treat modification as capable of restricting processing including restricting deletion in some cases, record withdrawal or change requests as it records consent itself, disseminate any change through its systems to authorized users and relevant third parties, and define and meet a response time, with processing already performed before withdrawal remaining appropriate but its results not used for new processing.
This control maps to 13 controls across 9 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
ISO 27701:2019 7.3.4 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 27701:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold SOC 2 and 58 of 108 ISO 27701:2019 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 289 were rejected on the SOC 2 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 13 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.