ISO 27701:2019
PIMS-specific guidance related to ISO/IEC 27002, ISO 27701:2019

ISO 27701:2019 6.6.3: User responsibilities

Users must meet their own responsibilities for protecting authentication information as the base guidance requires, read as protecting the personal data that their credentials unlock.

Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 45 controls across 20 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

PCI DSS 4.0 · 6 controls

  • 12.1.1 12.1.1 Overall information security policy established and disseminated
  • 12.2.1 12.2.1 Rules for acceptable use of end-user technology
  • 12.6.3 12.6.3 Security awareness training on hire and annually with acknowledgment
  • 7.1.1 7.1.1 Requirement 7 policies and procedures maintained
  • 8.3.11 8.3.11 Tokens, smart cards and certificates individually assigned
  • 8.3.8 8.3.8 Authentication policies communicated to users

ISO 27001:2022 · 5 controls

  • 5.10 Acceptable use of information and other associated assets
  • 5.17 Authentication information
  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security
  • 6.3 Information security awareness, education and training
  • 6.8 Information security event reporting

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 5 controls

SOC 2 · 5 controls

  • SOC2-CC2.2 CC2.2 Internal communication of objectives and control responsibilities (COSO principle 14)
  • SOC2-CC5.3 CC5.3 Deploying controls through policies and procedures (COSO principle 12)
  • SOC2-CC6.1 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
  • SOC2-CC6.3 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties
  • SOC2-P5.1 P5.1 Data subject access

ISO 27002:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.10 Acceptable use of information and other associated assets
  • 5.36 Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security
  • 6.3 Information security awareness, education and training

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

  • CIS-14.3 Train Workforce Members on Authentication Best Practices
  • CIS-5.2 Use Unique Passwords

CMMC 2.0 · 2 controls

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

  • IA-5(6) Protection of Authenticators
  • PL-4 Rules of Behavior

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

  • IA-5(6) Protection of Authenticators
  • PL-4 Rules of Behavior
  • NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01 Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed by the organization
  • NIST-CSF-PR.AT-01 Personnel are provided with awareness and training so that they possess the knowledge and skills to perform general tasks with cybersecurity risks in mind
  • ASBv3-IM-8 Restrict the exposure of credential and secrets

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-IDM-08 Confidentiality of authentication information

ISO 19011:2018 · 1 control

  • 6.4.2 Assigning roles and responsibilities of guides and observers

ISO 27017:2015 · 1 control

  • 9.3 User responsibilities

ISO 27018:2019 · 1 control

  • 9.3 User responsibilities

ISO/IEC 38500:2024 · 1 control

  • 5.11 Social responsibility

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in PIMS-specific guidance related to ISO/IEC 27002, ISO 27701:2019

You are reading one control. How much of ISO 27701:2019 have you already done?

ISO 27701:2019 6.6.3 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 27701:2019 your existing evidence covers. Hold SOC 2 and 58 of 108 ISO 27701:2019 controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 289 were rejected on the SOC 2 pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 45 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.