The organization must decide what competence is needed by people working under its control whose work affects information security performance; make sure they are competent through education, training or experience; where applicable act to acquire the competence and check those actions worked; and keep documented evidence of competence. The note gives examples such as training, mentoring or reassigning current staff, or hiring or contracting competent people.
This control maps to 2 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
ISO 27001:2022 clause-7.2 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of ISO 27001:2022 your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 79 of 93 ISO 27001:2022 controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 170 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.