The usage of each software tool is planned: its identification and version, configuration, use cases, environment, the maximum ASIL of the requirements it supports, and the methods to evaluate it, as the basis for determining the tool impact (TI), tool error detection (TD) and tool confidence level (TCL). This sits in clause 11, whose stated aims, per the SGS quotation, are criteria for the confidence needed in a software tool and, where applicable, the means to qualify the tool so its use for tasks the standard requires can be relied on. Requirement text not held.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.