Where an existing element is reused, an element-level impact analysis shall identify the modifications of the operational environment including the resulting modifications of the element; assess whether the reused element, modified or not, can meet the safety requirements assigned to it from the item or element integrating it; identify the safety activities to be performed based on the impact of the modifications including on the validity of previous assumptions; and evaluate the existing safety-related documentation of the element and judge whether it supports its integration into the item or into another element. Reuse can rest on the evaluation of a hardware element (ISO 26262-8 clause 13), the qualification of a software component (clause 12), a proven in use argument (clause 14) or development as an SEooC (ISO 26262-10).
This control maps to 3 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 3 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.