The organization documents how it selects suppliers. The process includes: judging the risk the supplier poses to product conformity and to continuity of supply; how the supplier has performed on quality and delivery; evaluation of its QMS; decisions taken by a cross-functional team; and, where applicable, an assessment of software development capability. Further criteria that should be weighed include the size of the supplier's automotive business (absolute and as a share of its total), financial stability, how complex the purchased item is, the technology needed, adequacy of resources, capability in design and development, capability in manufacturing, the change management process, business continuity planning, logistics and customer service.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.