Watching publicly accessible spaces by optical-electronic means (video surveillance) is lawful only to the extent needed for a public body's tasks, for exercising the right to decide who may enter or stay (domestic authority, Hausrecht), or for legitimate interests pursued for concretely specified purposes, and only if nothing indicates that the overriding legitimate interests of those observed prevail. For large publicly accessible facilities (sports grounds, venues for assembly and entertainment, shopping centres, car parks) and for vehicles and large facilities of public rail, ship and bus transport, protecting the life, health and freedom of people present counts as a particularly important interest.
This control maps to 2 controls across 2 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 2 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.