FedRAMP Moderate RA-5(3): Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning | Breadth and Depth of Coverage. Define the breadth and depth of vulnerability scanning coverage

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 18 controls across 14 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 3 controls

SOC2-CC7.1 Detection and monitoring procedures for security events are in place
SOC2-CC7.2 Monitors system components for anomalies indicating malicious acts
SOC2-CC9.1 Identifies, selects and develops risk mitigation activities

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

CIS-7.5 Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Internal Enterprise Assets
CIS-7.6 Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Externally-Exposed Enterprise Assets

NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 · 2 controls

53A-C-COVERAGE Assessment Attribute: Coverage
53A-C-DEPTH Assessment Attribute: Depth

ACSC Essential Eight · 1 control

E8-PATCHAPP-ML2 Patch Applications (ML2)

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar · 1 control

SEC06-BP01 Perform vulnerability management

Azure Security Benchmark · 1 control

PV-5 Perform vulnerability assessments

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) · 1 control

CFTC-SS-35 Scope of Testing and Assessment

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 1 control

CCM-TVM-07 Vulnerability Identification

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 1 control

NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01 Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 1 control

03.11.02 Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 1 control

NIST800-RA-5 Vulnerability monitoring and scanning

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

11.3.1.2 Authenticated internal scans

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP Moderate have you already done?

FedRAMP Moderate RA-5(3) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP Moderate your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO 27002:2022 and 182 of 323 FedRAMP Moderate controls already carry evidence.

If you hold ISO 27002:202256.3% covered · 141 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.051.1% covered · 158 gaps If you hold ISO 27001:202249.8% covered · 162 gaps If you hold NIST SP 800-171 Rev 345.5% covered · 176 gaps If you hold C5 (Germany)37.2% covered · 203 gaps If you hold CMMC 2.035% covered · 210 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 348 were rejected on the ISO 27002:2022 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free