FedRAMP High
RA - Risk Assessment

FedRAMP High RA-5(3): Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning | Breadth and Depth of Coverage (RA-5(3))

Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning | Breadth and Depth of Coverage. Define the breadth and depth of vulnerability scanning coverage

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 18 controls across 14 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

SOC 2 · 3 controls

  • SOC2-CC7.1 CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
  • SOC2-CC7.2 CC7.2 Monitoring system components for anomalies
  • SOC2-CC9.1 CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption

CIS Controls v8 · 2 controls

  • CIS-7.5 Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Internal Enterprise Assets
  • CIS-7.6 Perform Automated Vulnerability Scans of Externally-Exposed Enterprise Assets
  • E8-PATCHAPP-ML2 Patch Applications (ML2)
  • PV-5 Perform vulnerability assessments

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities
  • 03.11.02 Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 11.3.1.2 11.3.1.2 Authenticated internal vulnerability scanning

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in RA - Risk Assessment

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High RA-5(3) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 18 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.