FedRAMP High
IR - Incident Response

FedRAMP High IR-9(3): Information Spillage Response | Post-spill Operations. Implement the following procedures to ensure that organizational personnel impacted by information spills can continue to carry out assigned tasks while contaminated systems are undergoing corrective actions: [Assignment:

Information Spillage Response | Post-spill Operations. Implement the following procedures to ensure that organizational personnel impacted by information spills can continue to carry out assigned tasks while contaminated systems are undergoing corrective actions: [Assignment:

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 15 controls across 4 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • NIST-CSF-RC.CO-03 Recovery activities and progress in restoring operational capabilities are communicated to designated internal and external stakeholders
  • NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01 The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed once initiated from the incident response process
  • NIST-CSF-RC.RP-04 Critical mission functions and cybersecurity risk management are considered to establish post-incident operational norms
  • NIST-CSF-RS.MI-01 Incidents are contained

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 4 controls

  • NIST800-CP-10 System recovery and reconstitution
  • NIST800-CP-11 Alternate Communications Protocols. Provide the capability to employ [organization-defined] in support of maintaining continuity of operations
  • NIST800-IR-9 Information Spillage Response. Respond to information spills by: Assigning [organization-defined] with responsibility for responding to information spills; Identifying the specific information involved in the system contamination; Alerting [organization-defined] of the information spill using a
  • NIST800-SC-47 Alternate Communications Paths. Establish [organization-defined] for system operations organizational command and control

SOC 2 · 4 controls

  • SOC2-A1.3 Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
  • SOC2-CC6.5 Discontinues logical and physical protections over physical assets only after the ability to read or recover data and software from those assets has been diminished and is no longer required to meet the entity's
  • SOC2-CC7.4 Responds to identified security incidents through defined procedures
  • SOC2-CC7.5 Identifies the root cause of security incidents

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

  • 5.24 Information security incident management planning and preparation
  • 5.26 Response to information security incidents
  • 5.29 Information security during disruption

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in IR - Incident Response

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High IR-9(3) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 15 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.