FedRAMP High
IA - Identification and Authentication

FedRAMP High IA-12: Identity Proofing. a. Identity proof users that require accounts for logical access to systems based on appropriate identity assurance level requirements as specified in applicable standards and guidelines; b. Resolve user identities to a

Identity Proofing. a. Identity proof users that require accounts for logical access to systems based on appropriate identity assurance level requirements as specified in applicable standards and guidelines; b. Resolve user identities to a

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 11 controls across 10 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27002:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.16 Identity management
  • 8.5 Secure authentication
  • MYHR-REG-2 Healthcare recipient registration and identity verification

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-HR-01 Verification of qualification and trustworthiness

ISO 27001:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.16 Identity management
  • NIST-CSF-PR.AA-02 Identities are proofed and bound to credentials based on the context of interactions

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 8.3.3 User identity is verified before modifying any authentication factor

SOC 2 · 1 control

  • SOC2-CC6.2 Prior to granting access, registration and authorization processes are established

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in IA - Identification and Authentication

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High IA-12 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 11 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.