FedRAMP High
CP - Contingency Planning

FedRAMP High CP-4(1): Coordinate with Related Plans

Coordinate contingency plan testing with related plan testing.

Maintained by Gerard BlokdykVerified against the published standard Control text last updated

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 16 controls across 12 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

  • CFTC-SS-11 Testing and Review of Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Capabilities
  • CFTC-SS-28 Synchronised Testing with Members and Market Participants

ISO 27001:2022 · 2 controls

  • 5.29 Information security during disruption
  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity

SOC 2 · 2 controls

  • SOC2-A1.3 Recovery plan procedures support system recovery from failures
  • SOC2-CC8.1 Change management processes are in place

C5 (Germany) · 1 control

  • C5-BCM-04 Verification, updating and testing of the business continuity

CIS Controls v8 · 1 control

  • CIS-17.7 Conduct Routine Incident Response Exercises

ISO 22301:2019 · 1 control

  • 8.5 Exercise programme

ISO 27002:2022 · 1 control

  • 5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
  • NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01 The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties once an incident is declared

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

  • 12.10.2 IRP reviewed and tested annually

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

Other controls in CP - Contingency Planning

You are reading one control. How much of FedRAMP High have you already done?

FedRAMP High CP-4(1) is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of FedRAMP High your existing evidence covers. Hold C5 (Germany) and 119 of 410 FedRAMP High controls already carry evidence.

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 6 were rejected on the C5 (Germany) pair alone.

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 16 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.