Art.56 requires the AI Office and the Board to encourage and facilitate the drawing up of codes of practice at Union level covering the Art.53 and Art.55 obligations, sets what those codes should aim to cover and how their adequacy is assessed, and allows the Commission to approve a code by implementing act and give it general validity. A provider may rely on an approved code to demonstrate compliance until a harmonised standard is published, but is not required to. The duty that bites on a provider, to demonstrate alternative adequate means of compliance where it neither adheres to an approved code nor complies with a harmonised standard, sits in Art.53(4) and is counted at EUAI-Art.53.
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.56 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.