Where a general-purpose AI model meets the high impact capability condition in Art.51(1)(a), its provider must notify the Commission without delay and in any event within two weeks after that requirement is met or it becomes known that it will be met, including the information necessary to demonstrate that the requirement has been met. With the notification the provider may present sufficiently substantiated arguments that the model exceptionally does not present systemic risks because of its specific characteristics. A provider whose model the Commission has designated as presenting systemic risk may make a reasoned request for reassessment containing objective, detailed and new reasons arisen since the designation, at the earliest six months after the designation decision or after a decision maintaining it.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.52 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.