Before placing on the market or putting into service an Annex III high-risk AI system other than one listed under Annex III point 2, the provider or, where applicable, the authorised representative must register itself and the system in the EU database. The same duty applies before placing on the market or putting into service an AI system that the provider has concluded is not high-risk under Art.6(3). Deployers that are public authorities, Union institutions, bodies, offices or agencies, or persons acting on their behalf, must register themselves, select the system and register its use before putting the system into service or using it. For Annex III points 1, 6 and 7 systems in law enforcement, migration, asylum and border control management, registration goes into the secure non-public section of the database and is limited to the listed Annex VIII and Annex IX items. Annex III point 2 systems are registered at national level.
This control maps to 6 controls across 5 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.49 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 6 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.