The provider must affix the CE marking to the high-risk AI system visibly, legibly and indelibly or, where that is not possible or not warranted by the nature of the system, to its packaging or accompanying documentation. For high-risk AI systems provided digitally a digital CE marking must be used, and only where it can easily be accessed through the interface from which the system is accessed or through an easily accessible machine readable code or other electronic means. Where a notified body was involved in the conformity assessment, its identification number must follow the marking and must also appear in any promotional material stating that the system fulfils the CE marking requirements. The general principles in Art.30 of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 apply, and where other Union law also provides for CE marking the marking indicates conformity with that law as well.
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.48 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.