Where a high-risk AI system is to be placed on the market or put into service before its conformity assessment is complete, for exceptional reasons of public security, protection of the life and health of persons, environmental protection or protection of key industrial and infrastructural assets, an authorisation must be obtained from the market surveillance authority on a duly justified request. The authorisation runs for a limited period while the conformity assessment procedures are carried out, and those procedures must be completed without undue delay. In a duly justified situation of urgency, law enforcement or civil protection authorities may put such a system into service before authorisation provided the authorisation is requested during or after the use without undue delay; if it is refused, use must stop with immediate effect and all results and outputs of that use must be discarded immediately. For high-risk AI systems related to products covered by Section A of Annex I, only the derogations in that legislation apply.
EU AI Act EUAI-Art.46 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of EU AI Act your existing evidence covers. Hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and 17 of 43 EU AI Act controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the ISO/IEC 42001:2023 pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.