Financial entities may share cyber threat information and intelligence (for example compromise indicators, attacker tactics, techniques and procedures, security alerts and configuration tools) among themselves where the exchange aims to strengthen digital operational resilience, happens inside trusted communities of financial entities, and runs under arrangements that protect sensitive information and respect business confidentiality, the GDPR and competition guidelines; the arrangements set participation conditions and any role of public authorities, ICT providers and shared platforms. Participation is optional, but an entity that joins or leaves such an arrangement must notify its competent authority once membership is validated or the exit takes effect (Art. 45(3)).
This control maps to 26 controls across 12 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
DORA DORA-Art.45 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of DORA your existing evidence covers. Hold NIS2 Directive and 17 of 26 DORA controls already carry evidence.
Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIS2 Directive pair alone.
The graph holds this control, the 26 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.