The enterprise keeps up, and regularly communicates, why continuous improvement of information security is needed and what it brings; it gathers and analyses data about the ISMS and improves the system through corrective action where that is warranted. Regular reviews test how effective the ISMS is, including whether it meets its policy and objectives and how the security and privacy practices perform. ISMS audits take place at planned intervals. A regular management review confirms that the scope is still adequate and points to process improvements. Actions and events that might affect how effective the ISMS is or how well it performs are recorded, and what monitoring and review reveal is used to keep the security plans up to date.
This control maps to 4 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 4 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.