The processes and other parts of the management system are improved continually so they can deliver on the governance and management objectives, drawing on implementation guidance, new standards, compliance requirements, chances to automate, and feedback from users, the governance community and others. How the framework's components perform is assessed regularly and acted on. Business-critical processes are identified from their performance and conformance drivers and their risk; their capability is assessed, improvement targets are set and shortfalls in capability and control are analysed. Improvement initiatives are ranked by benefit and cost, carried out and then run as normal practice, with performance goals and metrics used to monitor them. Ways to raise efficiency and effectiveness, such as training, documentation, standardisation and automation, are considered. Quality management practices are applied when processes are updated. Governance components that are out of date (processes, information items, policies) are retired.
This control maps to 1 controls across 1 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.
Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.
The graph holds this control, the 1 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.