AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar SEC07-BP04: Define scalable data lifecycle management

What else in your programme already covers this

This control maps to 52 controls across 20 other frameworks. If you already hold one of them, the evidence you collected for it is the starting point here rather than new work.

ISO 27701:2019 · 5 controls

6.11.3 Test data
6.8.2 Equipment
7.4.5 PII de-identification and deletion at the end of processing
7.4.7 Retention
8.4.2 Return, transfer or disposal of PII

NIST SP 800-161 Rev 1 · 5 controls

161R1-CM-13 Data Action Mapping
161R1-MP-6 Media Sanitization
161R1-SI-12 Information Management and Retention
161R1-SR-12 Component Disposal
161R1-SR-4 Provenance

SOC 2 · 5 controls

SOC2-C1.1 C1.1 Identifying and maintaining confidential information
SOC2-C1.2 C1.2 Disposing of confidential information
SOC2-CC6.5 CC6.5 Protecting data on assets until disposal
SOC2-P4.2 P4.2 Retaining personal information
SOC2-P4.3 P4.3 Securely disposing of personal information

CIS Controls v8 · 4 controls

CIS-3.1 Establish and Maintain a Data Management Process
CIS-3.4 Enforce Data Retention
CIS-3.5 Securely Dispose of Data
CIS-3.8 Document Data Flows

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 · 4 controls

CCM-DSP-01 Security and Privacy Policy and Procedures
CCM-DSP-02 Secure Disposal
CCM-DSP-15 Limitation of Production Data Use
CCM-DSP-16 Data Retention and Deletion

ISO 27002:2022 · 4 controls

5.12 Classification of information
8.10 Information deletion
8.11 Data masking
8.33 Test information

C5 (Germany) · 3 controls

C5-AM-04 Decommissioning of Hardware
C5-PI-02 Contractual agreements for the provision of data
C5-PI-03 Secure deletion of data

ISO 27001:2022 · 3 controls

5.33 Protection of records
8.10 Information deletion
8.11 Data masking

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) · 2 controls

AUCDR-IS-3 Securely manage information assets over their lifecycle
AUCDR-PS-12 Privacy Safeguard 12 - Security of CDR data and destruction or de-identification of redundant CDR data

Azure Security Benchmark · 2 controls

AM-3 Ensure security of asset lifecycle management
ASBv3-LT-6 Configure log storage retention

FedRAMP High · 2 controls

MP-6 Media Sanitization
SI-12 Information Management and Retention

FedRAMP Moderate · 2 controls

MP-6 Media Sanitization
SI-12 Information Management and Retention

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 · 2 controls

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-08 Systems, hardware, software, services, and data are managed throughout their life cycles
NIST-CSF-PR.DS-10 The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-in-use are protected

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 · 2 controls

03.08.03 Media Sanitization
03.14.08 Information Management and Retention

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 · 2 controls

NIST800-SI-12 SI-12 Information Management and Retention
NIST800-SI-19 SI-19 De-identification

CMMC 2.0 · 1 control

MP.L2-3.8.3 Media Disposal

HIPAA Security Rule · 1 control

164.310(d)(2)(i) Disposal (Required)

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 · 1 control

A.7.2 Data for development and enhancement of AI system

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 · 1 control

164.310(d)(2)(i) Disposal (Required)

PCI DSS 4.0 · 1 control

3.2.1 3.2.1 Data retention and disposal minimise stored account data

Every mapping shown was judged rather than inferred from wording similarity, and the ones that failed review are published too. See the coverage reports and what was rejected.

You are reading one control. How much of AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar have you already done?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar SEC07-BP04 is one control. If you already hold one of the frameworks below, a reviewed crosswalk already says how much of AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar your existing evidence covers. Hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and 52 of 63 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls already carry evidence.

If you hold NIST SP 800-53 Rev 582.5% covered · 11 gaps If you hold Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.174.6% covered · 16 gaps If you hold ISO 27002:202273% covered · 17 gaps If you hold FedRAMP Moderate69.8% covered · 19 gaps If you hold Azure Security Benchmark65.1% covered · 22 gaps If you hold PCI DSS 4.063.5% covered · 23 gaps

Each report names every control your existing framework evidences, every one it does not, the reasoning behind each claim, and the claims that were argued against and rejected. 0 were rejected on the NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 pair alone.

See the released pairs, $299 each Browse the graph free