Reviews repeat the hazard identification methods and consult workers and their representatives, asking whether controls work in design and operation, whether they introduced new problems, whether all hazards were identified, whether new methods, equipment or chemicals make the job safer, whether procedures are followed and training was effective, whether workers are involved and raising concerns, whether incident frequency and severity are falling, and whether new legislation or information makes current controls less effective. Problems send the process back to Step 3. Higher risk controls should be reviewed more often, and designers, manufacturers and suppliers may use quality assurance and user feedback to check their products reduce risk.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.