Australia Health Insurance (Accredited Pathology Laboratories, Approval) Principles 2017
Part 3: approval of premises, interim approval, period, revocation and variation (sections 11 to 16) – Australia Health Insurance (Accredited Pathology Laboratories, Approval) Principles 2017

Australia Health Insurance (Accredited Pathology Laboratories, Approval) Principles 2017 11: Qualify for approval: show with a high level of confidence, through the most recent NATA assessment report, that the pathology services will meet the relevant standards for the kinds of services and the category sought, and comply with the Act and these Principles

What does 11 require?

Premises are approved only where the Minister is satisfied with a high level of confidence that the pathology services to be rendered there will meet the relevant standards for the kinds of services and the category applied for, and that the premises comply with the Act and these Principles. The application is considered only on the most recent assessment report for the premises from the independent body or a special adviser, and the report must support approval for the kinds of services and the category covered by the application; where it does not, the applicant may narrow the kinds of services or the category and have the amended application dealt with as a fresh one. Absent exceptional circumstances, premises are not approved where, within the six months before the application, the last accreditation action was a refusal or a revocation of accreditation for the kinds of services or category now sought. In practice the approved pathology authority must therefore hold a current, favourable NATA assessment covering every item group and the category it intends to claim before lodging the approval application with Services Australia.

Maintained by Gerard Blokdyk

Other controls in Part 3: approval of premises, interim approval, period, revocation and variation (sections 11 to 16) – Australia Health Insurance (Accredited Pathology Laboratories, Approval) Principles 2017

Query this from an agent

The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.