A program is never finished. The provider continuously evaluates and reviews its program to find and act on areas for improvement and to gauge the impact of educational innovations, covering what is taught, how well teaching and supervision are delivered, how assessment works and how progression decisions are made, and it moves quickly and effectively when any part of the program's quality is in question or at risk. It gathers feedback on a regular, systematic basis from students, from staff, from the providers of prevocational training, from health services and from communities, analyses it and acts on it. It compares notes with other medical schools on outcomes, teaching methods and assessment, and watches developments in medicine and medical education at home and abroad.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.