The assessment system is itself assessed. The provider regularly reviews its assessment policies and practices, including how it blueprints and sets standards, asking whether the system remains fair, flexible, equitable, valid, reliable and fit for its purpose, using a range of review methods and both quantitative and qualitative data. Where sites assess the same learning outcomes in different ways, those ways rest on consistent expectations and impose comparable assessment burdens on students.
The graph holds this control, the 0 it maps to, and the evidence behind each claim, over MCP and REST.